Commercial Law, 2011 Bar — Question 77

MULTIPLE CHOICE

“CROCOS" which he uses on his ready-to-wear clothes. Banking on the popularity of T's trade mark, B came up with his own “CROCOS” mark, which he then used for his “CROCOS" burgers. T 106 BAR Q &A nu COMMERCIAL LAW now sues B for trademark infringement but B argues that his product is a burger, hence, there is no infringement. Is B correct? A) No, since the owner of a well-known mark registered in the Philippines has rights that extends even to dissimilar kinds of goods. B) Yes, since the right of the owner of a wellknown mark registered in the Philippines does not extend to goods which are not of the same kind. C) Yes, as B was in bad faith in coming up with his own “CROCOS" mark. D) No, since unlike T, he did not register his own “CROCOS" mark for his product.

No account needed — submit and the suggested answer appears right here. Connect Google anytime to keep your progress on any device.