Civil Law, 2012 Bar — Question 84

MULTIPLE CHOICE

Michael Fermin, without the authority of Pascual Lacas, owner of a car, sold the same car in the name of Mr. Lacas to Atty. Buko. The contract between Atty. Buko and Mr. Lacas is A) void because of the absence of consent from the owner, Mr. Lacas. B) valid because all of the essential requisites of a contract are present. C) unenforceable because Michael Fermin had no authority but he sold the car in the name of Mr. Lacas, the owner. D) rescissible because the contract caused lesion to Atty. Buko.

You can write freely without an account. Sign in to reveal the suggested answer and track your progress.