Skip to content
VVocatus · Bar Exam Practice

Political Law, 2015 Bar — Question XIII

Political Law
2015 BarPolitical LawQ. XIII

QUESTION

On August 15, 2015, Congresswoman Dina Tatalo filed and sponsored House Bill No. 5432, entitled “An Act Providing for the Apportionment of the Lone District of the City of Pangarap.” The bill eventually became a law, R.A. No. 1234. It mandated that the lone legislative district of the City of Pangarap would now consist of two (2) districts. For the 2016 elections, the voters of the City of Pangarap would be classified as belonging to either the first or second district, depending on their place of residence. The constituents of each district would elect their own representative to Congress as well as eight (8) members of the Sangguniang Panglungsod. R.A. No. 1234 apportioned the City’s barangays. The COMELEC thereafter promulgated Resolution No. 2170 implementing R.A. No. 1234. Piolo Cruz assails the COMELEC Resolution as unconstitutional. According to him, R.A. No. 1234 cannot be implemented without conducting a plebiscite because the apportionment under the law falls Within the meaning of creation, division, merger, abolition or substantial alteration of boundaries of cities under Section 10, Article X of the 1987 Constitution. Is the claim correct? Explain. (4%)

0 words

You can write freely without an account. Sign in to reveal the suggested answer and track your progress.